From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:54:17 -0500 Message-ID: <4402A219.8010501@pobox.com> References: <20060227061354.GO3674@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060227061354.GO3674@stusta.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Tom Seeley , Dave Jones , Jiri Slaby , michael@mihu.de, mchehab@infradead.org, v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, video4linux-list@redhat.com, Brian Marete , Ryan Phillips , gregkh@suse.de, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Sanjoy Mahajan , Luming Yu , len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Lord , Randy Dunlap , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, Pavlik Vojtech , linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Meelis Roos List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159 > Submitter : Mark Lord > Handled-By : Randy Dunlap > Status : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this. Jeff