From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:07:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4404671D.70506@pobox.com> References: <43F2050B.8020006@dgreaves.com> <200602141300.37118.lkml@rtr.ca> <440040B4.8030808@dgreaves.com> <440083B4.3030307@rtr.ca> <4400A1BF.7020109@rtr.ca> <4400B439.8050202@dgreaves.com> <4401122A.3010908@rtr.ca> <44017B4B.3030900@dgreaves.com> <4401B560.40702@rtr.ca> <4403704E.4090109@rtr.ca> <4403A84C.6010804@gmail.com> <4403CEA9.4080603@rtr.ca> <44042863.2050703@dgreaves.com> <44046074.4070201@rtr.ca> <440462E1.2010909@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:30346 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932216AbWB1PHP (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:07:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <440462E1.2010909@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Justin Piszcz , IDE/ATA development list Mark Lord wrote: > Justin Piszcz wrote: > >> Will your verbosity patch make it into 2.6.16-rcX? > > > I don't think so -- it was a bit of a hack to make the ATA opcode > visible at those points in the code. > > The better approach might be to just have separate fields > for "command" and "status" in the ata tf. With that, a much less > invasive patch could be prepared. > > I can spin one quickly here if Jeff thinks it could > be gotten into 2.6.16. Otherwise, I won't -- my code base > here is leagues behind the current libata-dev. Nah we should really dump the full taskfile... Jeff