From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] sata_sil: kill bogus PCI ID 0x1095/0x0240 Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 02:41:47 -0500 Message-ID: <440A963B.4080406@pobox.com> References: <11415422321792-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:22987 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752082AbWCEHlu (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Mar 2006 02:41:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <11415422321792-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Carlos.Pardo@siliconimage.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Silicon Image confirmed that 0x1095/0x0240 has never been used for > 3112. Kill it. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: Carlos Pardo > > --- > > drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c | 1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > 4c960f8b73294d01b9307ea6775304fc8556e550 > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c > index 8cb662d..0d962a4 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c > @@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ static void sil_post_set_mode (struct at > > static const struct pci_device_id sil_pci_tbl[] = { > { 0x1095, 0x3112, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3112 }, > - { 0x1095, 0x0240, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3112 }, > { 0x1095, 0x3512, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3512 }, > { 0x1095, 0x3114, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3114 }, > { 0x1002, 0x436e, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3112 }, These things just don't get made up out of thin air. I'm wonder if it applies to a Silicon Image product running under a proprietary driver, or OEM product with a bunch of SiI chips on it. In any case, I'm reluctant to remove it. Jeff