From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate(), take #3 Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:10:56 -0500 Message-ID: <440B0D90.2080005@pobox.com> References: <11415489584127-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:26835 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932172AbWCEQK6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Mar 2006 11:10:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <11415489584127-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Jeff. > > This is the third take of implement-and-use-ata_dev_revalidate > patchset. In the last take[1], out of four patches, %1, %2 and %4 got > ACK'ed while %3 had some minor issues. > > Changes from the last take are... > > * in #3, ata_dev_same_device() tags mismatch messages with KERN_INFO > instead of KERN_WARNING. > > * in #3, ata_dev_revalidate() returns -ENODEV instead of 0 if device > isn't present I thought this was take #4? Anyway... applied 1-4