Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:25:43 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 28 2006, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >>> Jeff Garzik wrote: >>>> Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>> I'm sure Hannes will regenerate against upstream as well if necessary, >>>>> however that depends on when this should be applied. >>>> It's far too late and too intrusive for 2.6.16-rc. >>>> >>>> It's #upstream or . >>>> >>> Calm down. Of course I will regenerate is against #upstream. >>> In fact, I've done so initially but wasn't sure what the status of >>> libata-dev is. So I've diffed it against linux-git instead. >>> >>> Updated patch to follow. >> Thanks Hannes. I wasn't so much worried about it going directly in (I >> have no problem waiting), just that there seemed to be some disagreement >> on where suspend is at and what we can "support". > > Hi Hannes, > > Did you ever send the updated patch? I need it to use with the > rest of the ata-acpi objects patchset for #upstream (actually for -mm). > Oh, sorry. I got tangled up with other issues (namely ACPI integration for IDE drives :-). Patch against libata-dev is attached. Please apply. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH S390 & zSeries Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688 90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de