Douglas Gilbert wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Chris Paulson-Ellis wrote: >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I have a problem with udev persistent device naming for SATA drives >>>that is caused by the libata implementation of the page 0x83 SCSI >>>device identifier query. See this thead from hotplug-devel: >>> >>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113518947900002&r=1&w=2 >>> >>>I can work around the problem using /etc/scsi_id.config or udev rules >>>(see the thread), but here is a patch to fix the problem at source. >>>What do you think? >>> >>>Regards, >>>Chris. >>> >>>--- drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c.orig 2005-12-22 23:23:55.000000000 >>>+0000 >>>+++ drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c 2005-12-22 23:56:14.000000000 +0000 >>>@@ -1532,16 +1532,13 @@ >>> return 0; >>>} >>> >>>-static const char *inq_83_str = "Linux ATA-SCSI simulator"; >>>- >>>/** >>> * ata_scsiop_inq_83 - Simulate INQUIRY EVPD page 83, device identity >>> * @args: device IDENTIFY data / SCSI command of interest. >>> * @rbuf: Response buffer, to which simulated SCSI cmd output is >>>sent. >>> * @buflen: Response buffer length. >>> * >>>- * Returns device identification. Currently hardcoded to >>>- * return "Linux ATA-SCSI simulator". >>>+ * Returns ATA device serial number (as for page 80). >>> * >>> * LOCKING: >>> * spin_lock_irqsave(host_set lock) >>>@@ -1551,13 +1548,14 @@ >>> unsigned int buflen) >>>{ >>> rbuf[1] = 0x83; /* this page code */ >>>- rbuf[3] = 4 + strlen(inq_83_str); /* page len */ >>>+ rbuf[3] = 4 + ATA_SERNO_LEN; /* page len */ >>> >>> /* our one and only identification descriptor (vendor-specific) */ >>>- if (buflen > (strlen(inq_83_str) + 4 + 4 - 1)) { >>>+ if (buflen > (ATA_SERNO_LEN + 4 + 4 - 1)) { >>> rbuf[4 + 0] = 2; /* code set: ASCII */ >>>- rbuf[4 + 3] = strlen(inq_83_str); >>>- memcpy(rbuf + 4 + 4, inq_83_str, strlen(inq_83_str)); >>>+ rbuf[4 + 3] = ATA_SERNO_LEN; >>>+ ata_dev_id_string(args->id, (unsigned char *) rbuf + 4 >>>+ 4, >>>+ ATA_ID_SERNO_OFS, ATA_SERNO_LEN); >> >> >>Douglas Gilbert has an improved patch along these lines... Oops, a minor documentation malfunction with that patch. Here is a second attempt ... I assume that is a prompt to roll another version of that VPD patch, this time against lk 2.6.16-rc5 as my git tree is unavailable. Changelog: - make existing libata VPD device identification page (0x83) supply the ATA serial number in the libata "vendor specific" designator (from Chris Paulson-Ellis) - add a "t10 vendor id based" designator as defined in SAT rev 08 (section 10.3.4.2.3) that supplies ATA model and serial numbers - make the libata VPD page 0x83 more extensible (for adding more designators in the future). - rename EVPD to VPD in various places. Enable Vital Product Data (EVPD) is a bit in the INQUIRY cdb. Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert