From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: albertcc@tw.ibm.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] libata: implement ata_dev_init()
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:26:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44152CBD.3010405@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060313061926.GA30429@htj.dyndns.org>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Implement ata_dev_init() which is called before probing for new
> device. Note that ata_dev_init() is called only once for each
> attached device while ata_dev_configure() can be called multiple times
> for the same device.
>
> This change will be used by following per-dev xfer_mask patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> fix-class-handling-in-ata_bus_probe[1] patch clashes with this one.
> So, this is the regenerated patch. All others apply fine with offets.
>
> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/8712
>
> libata-core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: work/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2006-03-13 14:52:17.000000000 +0900
> +++ work/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2006-03-13 14:52:57.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1045,6 +1045,25 @@ unsigned int ata_pio_need_iordy(const st
> }
>
> /**
> + * ata_dev_init - initialize ata_device structure
> + * @ap: Port on which target device resides
> + * @dev: Target device to initialize
> + *
> + * Initialize @dev in preparation for device probing. This
> + * function is called only when a new device is about to be
> + * probed. ie. ata_dev_configure() is responsible for cleaning
> + * up affected fields across revalidations.
> + *
> + * LOCKING:
> + * none.
> + */
> +static void ata_dev_init(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *dev)
> +{
> + memset(dev, 0, sizeof(*dev));
> + dev->devno = dev - ap->device;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * ata_dev_read_id - Read ID data from the specified device
> * @ap: port on which target device resides
> * @dev: target device
> @@ -1371,8 +1390,10 @@ static int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port
> ata_port_probe(ap);
>
> /* reset and determine device classes */
> - for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
> + ata_dev_init(ap, &ap->device[i]);
> classes[i] = ATA_DEV_UNKNOWN;
> + }
>
> if (ap->ops->probe_reset) {
> rc = ap->ops->probe_reset(ap, classes);
> @@ -4607,8 +4628,6 @@ static void ata_host_init(struct ata_por
> struct ata_host_set *host_set,
> const struct ata_probe_ent *ent, unsigned int port_no)
> {
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> host->max_id = 16;
> host->max_lun = 1;
> host->max_channel = 1;
> @@ -4635,9 +4654,6 @@ static void ata_host_init(struct ata_por
> INIT_WORK(&ap->port_task, NULL, NULL);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ap->eh_done_q);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
> - ap->device[i].devno = i;
NAK:
1) the devices are embedded with ata_port, and so all static
initialization should be done in ata_host_init(). It's only called once
for each device, as you say, anyway... no need to separate it from the
rest of the struct ata_port initialization AFAICS.
2) there is no need to memset() [unless you are re-initializing, I suppose]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-13 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-12 7:02 [PATCHSET] libata: implement per-dev xfer masks Tejun Heo
2006-03-12 7:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] libata: implement ata_unpack_xfermask() Tejun Heo
2006-03-13 8:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-12 7:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask Tejun Heo
2006-03-13 8:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-13 9:30 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-13 9:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-13 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-13 10:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-13 10:24 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-21 1:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-21 10:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-12 7:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] libata: implement ata_dev_init() Tejun Heo
2006-03-13 6:19 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-13 8:26 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-03-13 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-12 7:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] libata: make per-dev transfer mode limits per-dev Tejun Heo
2006-03-13 8:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-13 9:33 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-12 13:37 ` [PATCHSET] libata: implement per-dev xfer masks Alan Cox
2006-03-13 6:12 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-13 11:41 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44152CBD.3010405@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).