From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: Make the the in_wq check as an inline
 function
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:56:22 -0500
Message-ID: <441533B6.9010106@pobox.com>
References: <440FEA4B.10500@tw.ibm.com> <44136D61.4020007@pobox.com> <4415203F.4070103@tw.ibm.com> <4415231B.1090906@tw.ibm.com> <44152588.10908@pobox.com> <44153074.8050304@tw.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:10210 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932364AbWCMI4Z (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:56:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <44153074.8050304@tw.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: albertl@mail.com
Cc: IDE Linux <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Doug Maxey <dwm@maxeymade.com>

Albert Lee wrote:
> Make the the in_wq check easier to read as an inline function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>

applied