From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:20:14 -0500 Message-ID: <441AD3AE.1030301@rtr.ca> References: <1142344212.4416ca14a26b4@webmail.aon.at> <44182CD7.9070401@rtr.ca> <20060316100838.GF3595@suse.de> <441A4873.3030102@rtr.ca> <441A80CA.6080407@tw.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:13547 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750803AbWCQPUQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:20:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <441A80CA.6080407@tw.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: albertl@mail.com Cc: Jeff Garzik , Jens Axboe , me_trash1@aon.at, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Albert Lee wrote: > Mark Lord wrote: .. >> We're both correct, in that 0x35 is ATA_CMD_WRITE_EXT as I said. >> But the naming had me fooled -- they really are DMA commands, >> even if the linux/ata.h names are incomplete. >> > > How about the attached renaming patch? > It could make the command names more consistent to what's in the ATA/ATAPI spec. .. Hey, that's a great idea. And the patch is quite small, too. Stick a Signed-Off-By line on it, and we'll see what our benevolent overJeff says for it. ;) Cheers