From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 00:29:26 +0900 Message-ID: <441AD5D6.10109@gmail.com> References: <1142344212.4416ca14a26b4@webmail.aon.at> <44182CD7.9070401@rtr.ca> <20060316100838.GF3595@suse.de> <441A4873.3030102@rtr.ca> <441A80CA.6080407@tw.ibm.com> <441AD3AE.1030301@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.166.177]:28562 "EHLO pproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932501AbWCQP3k (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:29:40 -0500 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w49so34429pyg for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:29:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <441AD3AE.1030301@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: albertl@mail.com, Jeff Garzik , Jens Axboe , me_trash1@aon.at, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Mark Lord wrote: > Albert Lee wrote: > >> Mark Lord wrote: > > .. > >>> We're both correct, in that 0x35 is ATA_CMD_WRITE_EXT as I said. >>> But the naming had me fooled -- they really are DMA commands, >>> even if the linux/ata.h names are incomplete. >>> >> >> How about the attached renaming patch? >> It could make the command names more consistent to what's in the >> ATA/ATAPI spec. > > .. > > Hey, that's a great idea. And the patch is quite small, too. > > Stick a Signed-Off-By line on it, and we'll see what our > benevolent overJeff says for it. ;) > One more Signed-off-by here. :-) -- tejun