From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] AHCI SATA vendor update from VIA Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:39:38 -0500 Message-ID: <44202C4A.8030508@pobox.com> References: <439CF812.8010107@pobox.com> <20060315191736.231a2894.vsu@altlinux.ru> <441F5C7D.2050600@pobox.com> <441FE146.3050406@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:2705 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751660AbWCUQjo (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:39:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <441FE146.3050406@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Sergey Vlasov , Geoff Rivell , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Sergey Vlasov wrote: >> >>> What is needed to get the VT8251 support into the kernel tree? >> >> >> 1) Doing what you are doing: asking questions like this. :) >> >> 2) Watching Tejun Heo's reset work. He already has an AHCI soft reset >> patch, and the VIA AHCI work really depends on this. >> > > BTW, what happened to AHCI softreset patch. It got acked[1], but it has > not made into the tree yet. Do you want me to regenerate it against the > current tree? Or is there anything holding it from going into the tree? Please resend, the only pending patch I have from you is the ATA transport class patch (thanks for doing that BTW), which is on hold waiting for SCSI updates. Jeff