From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] libata: Add __ata_scsi_ioctl Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:54:28 -0500 Message-ID: <4420AE54.6090603@pobox.com> References: <200603172304.k2HN4Stx030065@d01av02.pok.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:42683 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751976AbWCVBya (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:54:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200603172304.k2HN4Stx030065@d01av02.pok.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Brian King Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Brian King wrote: > > -int ata_scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, int cmd, void __user *arg) > +int __ata_scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, int cmd, void __user *arg) > { > - struct ata_port *ap; > - struct ata_device *dev; > int val = -EINVAL, rc = -EINVAL; > > - ap = (struct ata_port *) &scsidev->host->hostdata[0]; > - if (!ap) > - goto out; > - > - dev = ata_scsi_find_dev(ap, scsidev); > - if (!dev) { > - rc = -ENODEV; > - goto out; > - } > - > switch (cmd) { Rather than create a new function, it looks like the above code can simply be removed. I don't see anything that uses 'ap' or 'dev'. Jeff