From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: do not ignore PIO-only devices Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:47:25 +0900 Message-ID: <4421475D.4050205@gmail.com> References: <4420B439.6000608@comcast.net> <20060322114818.GA23515@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.166.177]:8309 "EHLO pproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751131AbWCVMrw (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:47:52 -0500 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m51so120105pye for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:47:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20060322114818.GA23515@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Ed Sweetman , jgarzik@pobox.com, "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" Tejun Heo wrote: > As libata now can do PIO, don't ignore PIO-only devices. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > --- > > I'm currently away from my machines due to idiotic/useless national > reserve military training :-(, so I only compile tested it. Ed, can > you please try the following patch and report the result? Jeff, > please don't apply until Ed confirms. > More info. I've tested PIO only mode with several harddisks and PX716SA by nuking dma mask in ata_set_mode() in not-so-distant past (several weeks ago) and didn't have any problem. -- tejun