From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, albertcc@tw.ibm.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] libata: add dev->sata_spd_limit and helpers
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:51:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <442ED9C5.3080301@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11438230982257-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> dev->sata_spd_limit contrains SATA PHY speed of the device and is
> initialized to the configured value on probing.
>
> Currently, This is only valid for dev[0] but still put into ata_device
> instead of ata_port. This is because 1. it's device constraints
> (ie. when hotpluggin, it should be cleared with other device info)
> 2. for port multiplier, link actually belongs to each device.
>
> Three helper functions - ata_down_sata_spd_limit(),
> ata_set_sata_spd_needed() and ata_set_sata_spd() - are implemented.
> They will be used by ata_bus_probe() rewrite and later by EH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
NAK, I definitely don't want to closely associate phy and device
parameters, because they are fundamentally two different things.
We program and address PHYs, so perhaps a sata_phy struct is needed.
Port multipliers also get interesting because we need to use ATA-ish
commands to talk to the PM phys. Perhaps a struct ata_port_mult inside
ata_device is warranted, where one stores an array of sata_phy structs,
and other PM-specific details.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-01 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-31 16:38 [PATCHSET] libata: improve ata_bus_probe failure handling Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 02/15] libata: make ata_bus_probe() return negative errno on failure Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 04/15] libata: convert do_probe_reset() to ata_do_reset() Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 01/15] libata: fix ata_set_mode() return value Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 17:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 03/15] libata: separate out ata_spd_string() Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 08/15] libata: don't disable devices from ata_set_mode() Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 19:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 06/15] libata: make ata_set_mode() handle no-device case properly Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 05/15] libata: implement ata_dev_enabled and disabled() Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-02 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 11/15] libata: preserve SATA SPD setting over hard resets Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 19:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 09/15] libata: implement ata_down_xfermask_limit() Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 22:31 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-01 0:11 ` Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 19:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-02 0:55 ` Tejun Heo
2006-04-02 6:58 ` Tejun Heo
2006-04-02 8:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 07/15] libata: reorganize ata_set_mode() Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 10/15] libata: add dev->sata_spd_limit and helpers Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 19:51 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-04-02 1:00 ` Tejun Heo
2006-04-02 8:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 13/15] libata: add 1s sleep between resets Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 19:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-02 1:07 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 15/15] libata: consider disabled devices in ata_dev_xfermask() Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 20:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-02 1:09 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 14/15] libata: improve ata_bus_probe() Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 19:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-31 16:38 ` [PATCH 12/15] libata: use SATA speeding down in ata_drive_probe_reset() Tejun Heo
2006-04-01 19:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-02 1:05 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=442ED9C5.3080301@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).