From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: improve ata_bus_probe failure handling, take 2 Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:38:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4430FB37.6040600@pobox.com> References: <11439680863256-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> <442FE142.7030304@pobox.com> <4430ECEF.30307@tw.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:22950 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750901AbWDCKiy (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 06:38:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4430ECEF.30307@tw.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: albertl@mail.com, Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Albert Lee wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Applied both series to #upstream. >> >> Albert, please check the irq-pio branch and make sure my merge is correct. >> > > The irq-pio branch looks good. > > I've a minor fix for cleanup, etc. > Will submit it later. Thanks. For the record, I do consider irq-pio upstream ready. It still needs to wait for Tejun's EH work to make it upstream, to give upstream people the test sets of - prep EH (2.6.17-rc1) - EH - NCQ - irq-pio Since each of these sets is staged, upstream testers will be able to say "2.6.17-rc1 works, but 2.6.18-git1 doesn't", which gives us a lot of good info. Jeff