From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Carlos.Pardo@siliconimage.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] sata_sil24: reimplement hardreset
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:44:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4435456E.6060504@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11442437423316-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Reimplement hardreset according to the datasheet. The old hardreset
> didn't reset controller status and the controller might not be ready
> after reset. Also, as SStatus is a bit slow to reflect PHY status
> after reset, sata_std_hardrset() doesn't wait long enough before
> proceeding.
>
> Note that as we're not depending on SStatus, we can't depend on DET==1
> condition to wait for link, so use shorter timeout for no device case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> 6d59c820f497b5af4db2532dcafab195759b7d28
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
> index 3d8047e..b468cca 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
> @@ -518,10 +518,42 @@ static int sil24_softreset(struct ata_po
>
> static int sil24_hardreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *class)
> {
> - unsigned int dummy_class;
> + void __iomem *port = (void __iomem *)ap->ioaddr.cmd_addr;
> + const char *reason;
> + int tout_msec, rc;
> +
> + /* sil24 does the right thing (tm) without any protection */
> + ata_set_sata_spd(ap);
> +
> + tout_msec = 100;
> + if (sata_dev_present(ap))
> + tout_msec = 5000;
> +
> + writel(PORT_CS_DEV_RST, port + PORT_CTRL_STAT);
> + rc = sil24_poll_register(port + PORT_CTRL_STAT,
> + PORT_CS_DEV_RST, 0, 10, tout_msec);
> +
> + if (rc) {
> + if (!sata_dev_present(ap))
> + return 0;
> + reason = "link not ready";
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (ata_busy_sleep(ap, ATA_TMOUT_BOOT_QUICK, ATA_TMOUT_BOOT)) {
> + reason = "device not ready";
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + /* SStatus is a bit sluggish (reports 0) on sil24, wait for it */
> + sil24_poll_register(port + PORT_SSTATUS, 0xf, 0x0, 10, 100);
Its weird to poll BSY before polling SStatus.
> + /* no classification, just return */
bad comment?
> + return 0;
>
> - /* sil24 doesn't report device signature after hard reset */
> - return sata_std_hardreset(ap, &dummy_class);
> + err:
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ata%u: hardreset failed (%s)\n", ap->id, reason);
> + return -EIO;
> }
>
> static int sil24_probe_reset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-06 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-05 13:29 [PATCHSET] sata_sil24: fixes, errata workaround and reset updates Tejun Heo
2006-04-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 6/8] sata_sil24: put port into known state before softresetting Tejun Heo
2006-04-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 5/8] sata_sil24: enable 64bit Tejun Heo
2006-04-06 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-06 16:55 ` Tejun Heo
2006-04-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/8] libata: export ata_set_sata_spd() Tejun Heo
2006-04-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 4/8] libata: separate out sil24_poll_register() Tejun Heo
2006-04-06 16:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-06 16:48 ` Tejun Heo
2006-04-06 16:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 3/8] sata_sil24: implement loss of completion interrupt on PCI-X errta fix Tejun Heo
2006-04-06 16:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 7/8] sata_sil24: kill 10ms sleep in softreset Tejun Heo
2006-04-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/8] sata_sil24: fix on-memory structure byteorder Tejun Heo
2006-04-06 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-06 16:56 ` Tejun Heo
2006-04-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 8/8] sata_sil24: reimplement hardreset Tejun Heo
2006-04-06 16:44 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-04-06 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2006-04-06 16:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-04-06 8:20 ` [PATCHSET] sata_sil24: fixes, errata workaround and reset updates Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4435456E.6060504@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=Carlos.Pardo@siliconimage.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).