From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] libata: implement new SCR handling and port on/offline functions Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:35:20 -0400 Message-ID: <44668958.7060004@pobox.com> References: <1147348791300-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> <44665314.4040805@pobox.com> <4466695B.4050204@gmail.com> <44668399.2060101@pobox.com> <446687FD.8070406@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:42892 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750736AbWENBf2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 21:35:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <446687FD.8070406@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, axboe@suse.de, albertcc@tw.ibm.com, forrest.zhao@intel.com, efalk@google.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > So, the current ata_port_on/off functions can be considered as including > both PATA and SATA implementation, where SATA implementation got > collapsed into it because PATA implementation is trivial. ok, ACK this train of thought