From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFT] major libata update Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:45:04 -0400 Message-ID: <44691280.9040600@garzik.org> References: <20060515170006.GA29555@havoc.gtf.org> <20060515230256.GB4699@animx.eu.org> <1147736327.26686.224.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060515234743.GD4699@animx.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:45523 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750804AbWEOXpI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 19:45:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060515234743.GD4699@animx.eu.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wakko Warner wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: >> On Llu, 2006-05-15 at 19:02 -0400, Wakko Warner wrote: >>> How about PATA? Specifically intel's IDE chip. I have a machine that I can >>> blow the hard drive away if I want to. >> Give the patch on zeniv.linux.org.uk/~alan/IDE a go in that case and let >> me know how it behaves. > > I noticed one hunk failed with 2.6.17-rc4 when using > patch-2.6.17-rc3-ide2.gz > > It was only the version string so I should be ok. As I said, if it blows up > on me, that's ok. > > I attempted to patch Jeff's libata1 over top of this, it failed miserably. > > When I patched Jeff's libata1 over 2.6.17-rc4, it was ok, except for 2 > files: oh, its almost certain the patches will conflict. My suggestion was more of a reference--if-things-break. Jeff