From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update] Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:02:02 -0400 Message-ID: <446A2FBA.3040905@garzik.org> References: <4468B596.9090508@garzik.org> <1147789098.3505.19.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <4469F2B2.703@garzik.org> <1147794708.3505.30.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <4469F906.7040602@gmail.com> <1147796999.3505.42.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <446A0053.5070203@gmail.com> <1147798226.3505.56.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <446A06C7.5050609@gmail.com> <20060516195836.GA3807@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:36498 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750706AbWEPUCH (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2006 16:02:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060516195836.GA3807@infradead.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tejun Heo , James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:07:19AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Yes, but in scsi_priv.h, please ... I can actually think of another use >>> for it in terms of getting the SG reset handler to work properly. >> Okay, will do in scsi_priv.h > > Things used by the transport classes traditionally weren't in scsi_priv.h, > that was for scsi_mod internals only. Should we changed that? I'd rather > have another header for semi-volatile APIs transport classes use. Hence my objection... Transport classes also aren't SCSI-specific. Jeff