linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:41:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <446B9890.7030200@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605171036140.10823@g5.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 17 May 2006, James Bottomley wrote:
>> This is one of the questions.  Currently block has no concept of "host".
> 
> That's good. 
> 
> I don't understand why you'd ever _want_ a concept of "host". The whole 
> concept is broken and unnecessary. At no point should you even need to map 
> from request to host, but if you do, you don't need to introduce any 
> generic "host" notion, you can do it easily per-queue.

"host" is ultimately the wrong word, sure.

It's more about (a) grouping queues into a topology that the user 
expects, as exported by sysfs, and (b) grouping queues for the purposes 
of useful and/or necessary hardware operations like "stop <these> 
queues, so that we can bitbang the hardware".

That grouping of queues, along with the lib-ification of highly common 
request management code[1], is part of the non-SCSI utility that libata 
derives from drivers/scsi.

"group-wide operations" are highly common, and generic code inevitably 
results from that.  But IMO that's helper code, living on top of the 
perfectly-fine existing code.


> The whole fixation with "host" in the SCSI layer is a bug, I think. What 
> does it matter, really? And when do you actually have a "request_queue" 
> entry without already knowing which controller it is connected to (ie why 
> do you even need that mapping)?

True, the mapping is obtained from request_queue not request.

The entry point into a block driver is via q->request_fn(), which only 
has a request_queue for an argument.  So in practice, one usually 
obtains the private controller-info and bus-info data via the 
request_queue's ->queuedata.

Deep into sub-APIs, I've seen that sometimes you'll see only the request 
passed as an argument, because it's easier to walk 
request->queue->controller_info than to pass additional arguments to 
every function.

	Jeff


[1] "resource management":  refers to drivers/scsi's handling of 'device 
busy', 'group-of-queues busy' style transient errors, well integrated 
with block layer's command queueing and well synchronized with the EH 
thread.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-17 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4468B596.9090508@garzik.org>
     [not found] ` <1147789098.3505.19.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
2006-05-16 15:41   ` [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update] Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 15:51     ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 16:06       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 16:30         ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 16:39           ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 21:55             ` Luben Tuikov
2006-05-16 21:32           ` Luben Tuikov
2006-05-16 16:08       ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 16:13         ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 16:29         ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 16:37           ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 16:39           ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 16:50             ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 17:07               ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 17:09                 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 19:58                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-05-16 20:02                   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 21:28                   ` James Bottomley
2006-05-18  3:27                     ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-19 12:07                       ` [PATCH] SCSI: make scsi_implement_eh() generic API for SCSI transports Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 16:12       ` [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update] Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 16:38         ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 16:57           ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17  7:37             ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-17 15:06               ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 15:50                 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-17 15:58                   ` James Smart
2006-05-17 16:17                   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 17:53                     ` James Bottomley
2006-05-17 22:08                       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 22:15                         ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 17:47                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17 17:55                     ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-17 22:04                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17 22:12                         ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 21:41                     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-05-17 21:52                     ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-05-17 22:20                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-18  3:04                     ` Luben Tuikov
2006-05-17 16:05                 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-05-17 17:37                 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-17 21:58                   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-18  7:21                     ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-16 18:28       ` Luben Tuikov
2006-05-16 18:15     ` Luben Tuikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=446B9890.7030200@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).