From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:41:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <446B9890.7030200@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605171036140.10823@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 May 2006, James Bottomley wrote:
>> This is one of the questions. Currently block has no concept of "host".
>
> That's good.
>
> I don't understand why you'd ever _want_ a concept of "host". The whole
> concept is broken and unnecessary. At no point should you even need to map
> from request to host, but if you do, you don't need to introduce any
> generic "host" notion, you can do it easily per-queue.
"host" is ultimately the wrong word, sure.
It's more about (a) grouping queues into a topology that the user
expects, as exported by sysfs, and (b) grouping queues for the purposes
of useful and/or necessary hardware operations like "stop <these>
queues, so that we can bitbang the hardware".
That grouping of queues, along with the lib-ification of highly common
request management code[1], is part of the non-SCSI utility that libata
derives from drivers/scsi.
"group-wide operations" are highly common, and generic code inevitably
results from that. But IMO that's helper code, living on top of the
perfectly-fine existing code.
> The whole fixation with "host" in the SCSI layer is a bug, I think. What
> does it matter, really? And when do you actually have a "request_queue"
> entry without already knowing which controller it is connected to (ie why
> do you even need that mapping)?
True, the mapping is obtained from request_queue not request.
The entry point into a block driver is via q->request_fn(), which only
has a request_queue for an argument. So in practice, one usually
obtains the private controller-info and bus-info data via the
request_queue's ->queuedata.
Deep into sub-APIs, I've seen that sometimes you'll see only the request
passed as an argument, because it's easier to walk
request->queue->controller_info than to pass additional arguments to
every function.
Jeff
[1] "resource management": refers to drivers/scsi's handling of 'device
busy', 'group-of-queues busy' style transient errors, well integrated
with block layer's command queueing and well synchronized with the EH
thread.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-17 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4468B596.9090508@garzik.org>
[not found] ` <1147789098.3505.19.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
2006-05-16 15:41 ` [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update] Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 15:51 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 16:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 16:30 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 16:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 21:55 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-05-16 21:32 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-05-16 16:08 ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 16:13 ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 16:29 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 16:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 16:39 ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 16:50 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 17:07 ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 17:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 19:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-05-16 20:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 21:28 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-18 3:27 ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-19 12:07 ` [PATCH] SCSI: make scsi_implement_eh() generic API for SCSI transports Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 16:12 ` [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update] Jeff Garzik
2006-05-16 16:38 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-16 16:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 7:37 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-17 15:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-17 15:58 ` James Smart
2006-05-17 16:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 17:53 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-17 22:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 22:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17 17:55 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-17 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17 22:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-17 21:41 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-05-17 21:52 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-05-17 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-18 3:04 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-05-17 16:05 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-05-17 17:37 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-17 21:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-18 7:21 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-16 18:28 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-05-16 18:15 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=446B9890.7030200@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).