From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [Fwd: [RFT] major libata update] Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:27:48 +0900 Message-ID: <446BE9B4.60605@gmail.com> References: <4468B596.9090508@garzik.org> <1147789098.3505.19.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <4469F2B2.703@garzik.org> <1147794708.3505.30.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <4469F906.7040602@gmail.com> <1147796999.3505.42.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <446A0053.5070203@gmail.com> <1147798226.3505.56.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <446A06C7.5050609@gmail.com> <20060516195836.GA3807@infradead.org> <1147814935.3505.88.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1147814935.3505.88.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Garzik , SCSI Mailing List , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 20:58 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Things used by the transport classes traditionally weren't in scsi_priv.h, >> that was for scsi_mod internals only. Should we changed that? I'd rather >> have another header for semi-volatile APIs transport classes use. > > well ... OK we don't necessarily have a header for SCSI APIs exported > exclusively to transport classes. how about > drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_api.h? > Are we agreed on this? A new header file drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_api.h? -- tejun