linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, axboe@suse.de,
	forrest.zhao@intel.com, efalk@google.com,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] libata-eh-fw: implement new EH scheduling from PIO
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 18:42:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <446C4FA8.5020105@tw.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1147350444826-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> PIO executes without holding host_set lock, so it cannot be
> synchronized using the same mechanism as interrupt driven execution.
> port_task framework makes sure that EH is not entered until PIO task
> is flushed, so PIO task can be sure the qc in progress won't go away
> underneath it.  One thing it cannot be sure of is whether the qc has
> already been scheduled for EH by another exception condition while
> host_set lock was released.
> 
> This patch makes ata_poll_qc-complete() handle such conditions
> properly and make it freeze the port if HSM violation is detected
> during PIO execution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/scsi/libata-core.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> 52240d1d208615e461c41a5c297f521a8a892f0d
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
> index 436ff5b..86d6a7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
> @@ -3429,16 +3429,31 @@ skip_map:
>   *	LOCKING:
>   *	None.  (grabs host lock)
>   */
> -
>  void ata_poll_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
>  {
>  	struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ap->host_set->lock, flags);
> -	ap->flags &= ~ATA_FLAG_NOINTR;
> -	ata_irq_on(ap);
> -	ata_qc_complete(qc);
> +
> +	if (ap->ops->error_handler) {
> +		/* EH might have kicked in while host_set lock is released */
> +		qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, qc->tag);
> +		if (qc) {
> +			if (!(qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_HSM)) {
> +				ap->flags &= ~ATA_FLAG_NOINTR;
> +				ata_irq_on(ap);
> +				ata_qc_complete(qc);
> +			} else
> +				ata_port_freeze(ap);

I don't quite understand here. For the AC_ERR_HSM error, how does the
EH get triggered after ata_port_freeze()? Do we wait until time out?



> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/* old EH */
> +		ap->flags &= ~ATA_FLAG_NOINTR;
> +		ata_irq_on(ap);
> +		ata_qc_complete(qc);
> +	}
> +
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ap->host_set->lock, flags);
>  }
>  



  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-18 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-11 12:27 [PATCHSET 02/11] new EH framework, take 3 Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 02/11] libata-eh-fw: clear SError in ata_std_postreset() Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 03/11] libata-eh-fw: use special reserved tag and qc for internal commands Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 01/11] libata-eh-fw: add flags and operations for new EH Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 04/11] libata-eh-fw: update ata_qc_from_tag() to enforce normal/EH qc ownership Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 06/11] libata-eh-fw: implement ata_port_schedule_eh() and ata_port_abort() Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 07/11] libata-eh-fw: implement freeze/thaw Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 10:15   ` Albert Lee
2006-05-16 10:30     ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-16 10:43       ` Albert Lee
2006-05-16 11:17       ` Albert Lee
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 10/11] libata-eh-fw: update ata_exec_internal() for new EH Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 08/11] libata-eh-fw: implement new EH scheduling from PIO Tejun Heo
2006-05-18 10:42   ` Albert Lee [this message]
2006-05-18 11:49     ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-19  7:31       ` Albert Lee
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 05/11] libata-eh-fw: implement new EH scheduling via error completion Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 11/11] libata-eh-fw: update SCSI command completion path for new EH Tejun Heo
2006-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH 09/11] libata-eh-fw: update ata_scsi_error() " Tejun Heo
2006-05-13 22:01 ` [PATCHSET 02/11] new EH framework, take 3 Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=446C4FA8.5020105@tw.ibm.com \
    --to=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=albertl@mail.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=efalk@google.com \
    --cc=forrest.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).