From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: ICH8 and SATA Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 19:29:22 -0400 Message-ID: <44724952.4040003@garzik.org> References: <447169C8.9060708@garzik.org> <44723571.1090500@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:58018 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751302AbWEVX3Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 19:29:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44723571.1090500@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" Tejun Heo wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> BTW, Intel sez: >> >> "FYI, I added PIIX_FLAG_IGNORE_PCS and was able to boot on ICH8." >> > > Yeap, that should achieve about the same effect as the experimental > patch Andrew posted; also, about the same phantom bug. Nod, just sending that to note conclusively that ICH8+PCS is a confirmed problem case, as confirmed from multiple sources. > I don't think the phantom device problem is caused by missing > dev_select. We have enough dev_select() during classification. Just a guess. Can I easily reproduce this? I have a bunch of Intel machines, ICH5/6/7 (no ICH8 yet), of various flavors. Jeff