From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: jgarzik and max-sectors: out of memory
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 15:37:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4478AA6C.5070305@garzik.org> (raw)
ATA_MAX_SECTORS is 200, rather than than 256 like it should be. I seem
to recall that this was due to libata being incomplete in some area, but
I've tried in vain for a year to remember where the alleged
incompleteness was, to no avail. So, my brain is out of memory :)
Further -- someone with a long ATA memory correct me -- I think that we
can increase ATA_MAX_PRD beyond 256. Most DMA engines should just keep
chugging along, provided that we continue to respect the 64k IDE DMA
boundaries.
So, I propose that we rename ATA_MAX_SECTORS to ATA_LBA28_SECTORS, and
change its value to 256, and see what happens. People have reported
that that worked for them, so let's subject it to a wide test. If
people are extremely paranoid, we could increase it to 255, and then in
the next kernel version, bump it from 255 to 256.
Then we can look at increasing ATA_MAX_PRD, if that's feasible for PATA
hardware.
Jeff
next reply other threads:[~2006-05-27 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-27 19:37 Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-05-27 19:49 ` jgarzik and max-sectors: out of memory Mark Lord
2006-05-27 20:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 20:43 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-30 4:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-30 8:36 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-30 9:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-30 9:10 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-30 9:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-30 9:25 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4478AA6C.5070305@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).