From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 18:15:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4478CF7F.2080303@rtr.ca> References: <1148634262.2310.7.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com> <200605271423.40037.liml@rtr.ca> <200605272245.30108.axboe@suse.de> <4478BD60.40806@garzik.org> <20060527211157.GA31275@suse.de> <4478C1DD.2030204@garzik.org> <20060527212011.GA31551@suse.de> <4478CD4E.4000506@rtr.ca> <20060527221131.GA364@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:18587 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964999AbWE0WP3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 May 2006 18:15:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060527221131.GA364@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jeff Garzik , "zhao, forrest" , Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sat, May 27 2006, Mark Lord wrote: > >> Resume worked, with this output: >> >> May 27 18:03:33 localhost kernel: ATA status 80 >> May 27 18:03:33 localhost kernel: ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 >> May 27 18:03:33 localhost kernel: ATA status 00 >> May 27 18:03:33 localhost kernel: ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/33 >> >> Note that the second set are for the DVD-RW drive, >> which (being ATAPI) doesn't assert ATA_DRDY. > > Works for me too, I changed the delay to match the 200000 above just to > be on the safe side. But what was the kernel output for the status value? It's important here --> the printk() probably introduced enough delay to compensate for the removal of your other delay. You did remove the other delay, right? Cheers