From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 18:23:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4478D17C.2050300@rtr.ca> References: <1148634262.2310.7.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com> <200605271423.40037.liml@rtr.ca> <200605272245.30108.axboe@suse.de> <4478BD60.40806@garzik.org> <20060527211157.GA31275@suse.de> <4478C1DD.2030204@garzik.org> <20060527212011.GA31551@suse.de> <4478CD4E.4000506@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:34772 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965008AbWE0WX6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 May 2006 18:23:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe , Jeff Garzik , "zhao, forrest" , Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 27 May 2006, Mark Lord wrote: > >> Note that the second set are for the DVD-RW drive, >> which (being ATAPI) doesn't assert ATA_DRDY. > > Neither of them do. 80 is just your old ATA_BUSY (that you needed to wait > a long time for to disappear). Yeah, I know that. Just pointing it out because the original discussion suggested we might want the code to also wait for DRDY, which would be correct only for ATA disks. > Can you move the two new lines to *after* the ata_busy_wait? I'd like to > see if ATA_DRDY ever comes on (it quite possibly will not, just humor me) Okay. rebooting now..