linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git patch] libata resume fix
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:22:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <447C4718.6090802@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1148938482.5959.27.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 16:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Please pull from 'upstream-fixes' branch of
>> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
>>
>> to receive the following updates:
>>
>>  drivers/scsi/libata-core.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> Mark Lord:
>>       the latest consensus libata resume fix
> 
> If your devices are coming from poweron-reset then you will have to wait
> up to 31 seconds :( And yes, I _did_ have such a device at one point.

Not in a suspend/resume capable notebook, though.

I don't know of *any* notebook drives that take longer
than perhaps five seconds to spin-up and accept commands.
Such a slow drive wouldn't really be tolerated by end-users,
which is why they don't exist.

But I suppose people will want to suspend/resume bigger machines
too, in which case a 10000rpm Raptor might need 15 seconds or so.

We could bump up the existing timeout, I suppose.

Perhaps Jeff could comment on any potential harm in libata
for going all the way to 3100000 with the timeout?

Cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-30 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-28 20:34 [git patch] libata resume fix Jeff Garzik
2006-05-29 21:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-05-30 13:22   ` Mark Lord [this message]
2006-05-30 18:26     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-30 18:40       ` Ric Wheeler
2006-05-30 22:37       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-05-31  6:47         ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31  6:56           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-05-31 22:01       ` Bill Davidsen
2006-05-30 22:34     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=447C4718.6090802@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).