From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: State of resume for AHCI? Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:39:24 -0700 Message-ID: <447FB2EC.7050701@goop.org> References: <447F23C2.8030802@goop.org> <447F3250.5070101@rtr.ca> <20060601183904.GR4400@suse.de> <447F4BC2.8060808@goop.org> <1149210165.13451.4.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:63434 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751240AbWFBDj2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:39:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1149210165.13451.4.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "zhao, forrest" Cc: Jens Axboe , Mark Lord , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hannes Reinecke , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org zhao, forrest wrote: > According to our test of Hannes's patch, it's not sufficient to support > AHCI suspend/resume. > Yes. I merged it into mm2, and it didn't make any difference. > Now I'm writing a patch to try to provide complete support for AHCI > suspend/resume and will send out patch soon, hopefully by the end of > today. Great, looking forward to it. J