From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: State of resume for AHCI? Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:39:46 +0200 Message-ID: <447FDD32.7070403@suse.de> References: <447F23C2.8030802@goop.org> <447F3250.5070101@rtr.ca> <20060601183904.GR4400@suse.de> <447F4BC2.8060808@goop.org> <1149210165.13451.4.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:19160 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751206AbWFBGjs (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 02:39:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1149210165.13451.4.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "zhao, forrest" Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Jens Axboe , Mark Lord , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org zhao, forrest wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:19 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> It's a lot more complicated than that, I'm afraid. ahci doesn't eve= n >>> have the resume/suspend methods defined, plus it needs more work th= an >>> piix on resume. >>> =20 >> Hannes Reinecke's patch implements those functions, basically by=20 >> factoring out the shutdown and init code and calling them at=20 >> suspend/resume time as well. >> >> Is that correct/sufficient? Or should something else be happening? >=20 > According to our test of Hannes's patch, it's not sufficient to suppo= rt > AHCI suspend/resume. >=20 > Now I'm writing a patch to try to provide complete support for AHCI > suspend/resume and will send out patch soon, hopefully by the end of > today. >=20 Can I have details, please? What doesn't work? Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH S390 & zSeries Maxfeldstra=DFe 5 +49 911 74053 688 90409 N=FCrnberg http://www.suse.de