From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: SATA: Marvell 88SE6141 support? Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:33:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4491D241.3040506@garzik.org> References: <44916C5B.5000402@rtr.ca> <44917BFE.1070604@garzik.org> <4491A90E.8010702@rtr.ca> <5351048D-59BA-4348-BB35-BDFFD3622BE8@smarttech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:39055 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031440AbWFOVd5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:33:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5351048D-59BA-4348-BB35-BDFFD3622BE8@smarttech.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Gord Peters Cc: Mark Lord , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, IDE/ATA development list Gord Peters wrote: > At first I thought that only the Marvell SATA ports could be used for a > RAID (based on how they're labeled in the manual), but now I see that > either set of SATA ports can be used for RAID. So I may be able to set > my RAID up using the ICH7R based ports until the Marvell chip is > supported. Am I correct to believe that the Intel ICH7R chip is > supported in 2.6.16? Neither are hardware RAID. It's usually better to just use OS RAID. Jeff