From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de>
Cc: linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] libata-core.c conversion
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 01:51:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A40502.3040509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060629161001.GE23122@zmei.tnic>
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> @@ -1341,20 +1341,18 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device
> unsigned int xfer_mask;
> int i, rc;
>
> - if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev) && ata_msg_info(ap)) {
> - ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO,
> + if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev)) {
> + ata_dev_printk(dev, ATA_MSG_INFO,
> "%s: ENTER/EXIT (host %u, dev %u) -- nodev\n",
> __FUNCTION__, ap->id, dev->devno);
> return 0;
ATA_MSG_TRACE.
> }
>
> - if (ata_msg_probe(ap))
> - ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_DEBUG, "%s: ENTER, host %u, dev %u\n",
> + ata_dev_printk(dev, ATA_MSG_TRACE, "%s: ENTER, host %u, dev %u\n",
> __FUNCTION__, ap->id, dev->devno);
>
> /* print device capabilities */
> - if (ata_msg_probe(ap))
> - ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_DEBUG,
> + ata_dev_printk(dev, ATA_MSG_VDEBUG,
> "%s: cfg 49:%04x 82:%04x 83:%04x 84:%04x "
> "85:%04x 86:%04x 87:%04x 88:%04x\n",
> __FUNCTION__,
DEBUG
> @@ -1399,8 +1396,8 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device
> ata_dev_config_ncq(dev, ncq_desc, sizeof(ncq_desc));
>
> /* print device info to dmesg */
> - if (ata_msg_info(ap))
> - ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO, "ATA-%d, "
> + if (print_info)
> + ata_dev_printk(dev, ATA_MSG_DRV, "ATA-%d, "
> "max %s, %Lu sectors: %s %s\n",
> ata_id_major_version(id),
> ata_mode_string(xfer_mask),
Hmmm.. not INFO?
> @@ -2098,10 +2091,10 @@ static int ata_dev_set_mode(struct ata_d
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> - DPRINTK("xfer_shift=%u, xfer_mode=0x%x\n",
> + ata_dev_printk(dev, ATA_MSG_CMD, "xfer_shift=%u, xfer_mode=0x%x\n",
> dev->xfer_shift, (int)dev->xfer_mode);
DEBUG.
> @@ -2339,7 +2332,7 @@ static unsigned int ata_bus_softreset(st
> {
> struct ata_ioports *ioaddr = &ap->ioaddr;
>
> - DPRINTK("ata%u: bus reset via SRST\n", ap->id);
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_CMD, "ata%u: bus reset via SRST\n", ap->id);
DEBUG
>
> /* software reset. causes dev0 to be selected */
> if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_MMIO) {
> @@ -2686,10 +2680,11 @@ int ata_std_softreset(struct ata_port *a
> ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 0);
>
> /* issue bus reset */
> - DPRINTK("about to softreset, devmask=%x\n", devmask);
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_CMD, "%s: about to softreset, devmask=%x\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, devmask);
DEBUG
> err_mask = ata_bus_softreset(ap, devmask);
> if (err_mask) {
> - ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_ERR, "SRST failed (err_mask=0x%x)\n",
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_ERR, "SRST failed (err_mask=0x%x)\n",
> err_mask);
> return -EIO;
> }
> @@ -3107,7 +3106,8 @@ static unsigned int ata_dev_set_xfermode
> unsigned int err_mask;
>
> /* set up set-features taskfile */
> - DPRINTK("set features - xfer mode\n");
> + ata_dev_printk(dev, ATA_MSG_CMD, "%s: set features - xfer mode\n",
> + __FUNCTION__);
DEBUG
>
> ata_tf_init(dev, &tf);
> tf.command = ATA_CMD_SET_FEATURES;
> @@ -3145,7 +3146,8 @@ static unsigned int ata_dev_init_params(
> return AC_ERR_INVALID;
>
> /* set up init dev params taskfile */
> - DPRINTK("init dev params \n");
> + ata_dev_printk(dev, ATA_MSG_CMD, "%s: init dev params \n",
> + __FUNCTION__);
VDEBUG, I think.
>
> ata_tf_init(dev, &tf);
> tf.command = ATA_CMD_INIT_DEV_PARAMS;
> @@ -3456,7 +3466,8 @@ static int ata_sg_setup(struct ata_queue
> struct scatterlist *lsg = &sg[qc->n_elem - 1];
> int n_elem, pre_n_elem, dir, trim_sg = 0;
>
> - VPRINTK("ENTER, ata%u\n", ap->id);
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_SG, "%s: ENTER, ata%u\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, ap->id);
TRACE??? Not sure.
> WARN_ON(!(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_SG));
>
> /* we must lengthen transfers to end on a 32-bit boundary */
> @@ -3681,7 +3695,9 @@ static void ata_pio_sector(struct ata_qu
> page = nth_page(page, (offset >> PAGE_SHIFT));
> offset %= PAGE_SIZE;
>
> - DPRINTK("data %s\n", qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE ? "write" : "read");
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_CMD, "%s: data %s\n",
> + __FUNCTION__,
> + qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE ? "write" : "read");
Yeap, this is CMD. :-)
> @@ -5106,7 +5136,8 @@ int ata_port_start (struct ata_port *ap)
> return rc;
> }
>
> - DPRINTK("prd alloc, virt %p, dma %llx\n", ap->prd, (unsigned long long) ap->prd_dma);
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_VDEBUG, "%s: prd alloc, virt %p, dma %llx\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, ap->prd, (unsigned long long) ap->prd_dma);
DEBUG.
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -5241,7 +5272,7 @@ static void ata_host_init(struct ata_por
> /* turn on all debugging levels */
> ap->msg_enable = 0x00FF;
> #elif defined(ATA_DEBUG)
> - ap->msg_enable = ATA_MSG_DRV | ATA_MSG_INFO | ATA_MSG_CTL | ATA_MSG_WARN | ATA_MSG_ERR;
> + ap->msg_enable = ATA_MSG_VDEBUG | ATA_MSG_INFO | ATA_MSG_DRV | ATA_MSG_WARN | ATA_MSG_ERR;
I think it should be ATA_MSG_DEBUG | ATA_MSG_DRV | ATA_MSG_INFO |
ATA_MSG_WARN | ATA_MSG_ERR.
> #else
> ap->msg_enable = ATA_MSG_DRV | ATA_MSG_ERR | ATA_MSG_WARN;
ATA_MSG_DRV | ATA_MSG_INFO | ATA_MSG_WARN | ATA_MSG_ERR
> /* perform each probe synchronously */
> - DPRINTK("probe begin\n");
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_VDEBUG, "%s: probe begin\n", __FUNCTION__);
DEBUG
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> struct ata_port *ap;
> u32 scontrol;
> @@ -5453,9 +5484,15 @@ int ata_device_add(const struct ata_prob
> /* wait for EH to finish */
> ata_port_wait_eh(ap);
> } else {
> - DPRINTK("ata%u: bus probe begin\n", ap->id);
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_VDEBUG,
> + "%s: ata%u: bus probe begin\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, ap->id);
DEBUG
> +
> rc = ata_bus_probe(ap);
> - DPRINTK("ata%u: bus probe end\n", ap->id);
> +
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_VDEBUG,
> + "%s: ata%u: bus probe end\n",
> + __FUNCTION__, ap->id);
DEBUG
>
> if (rc) {
> /* FIXME: do something useful here?
> @@ -5469,7 +5506,8 @@ int ata_device_add(const struct ata_prob
> }
>
> /* probes are done, now scan each port's disk(s) */
> - DPRINTK("host probe begin\n");
> + ata_port_printk(ap, ATA_MSG_VDEBUG, "%s: host probe begin\n",
> + __FUNCTION__);
DEBUG
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> struct ata_port *ap = host_set->ports[i];
>
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-29 16:10 [PATCH 4/9] libata-core.c conversion Borislav Petkov
2006-06-29 16:51 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2006-06-29 17:07 ` Borislav Petkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-30 6:46 Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A40502.3040509@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=bbpetkov@yahoo.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox