From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de>
Cc: linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata dbg scheme conversion, take 1
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:03:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A407CF.4000508@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060629160912.GA23122@zmei.tnic>
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> This patchset converts the relevant pieces of libata to the new debugging
> scheme. Additionally, it adjusts the message level scheme to one appropriate for
> libata.
>
> There are still places which use the old debugging macros but they have to be
> dealt with on a case by case basis due to the functionality of the debugging
> macros. Although most of the levels should be appropriately mapped, there might
> still be some message level "skew" which can be dealt with in a later course.
Hello,
I think this patchset is looking good generally. Please consider the
following.
* Don't make currently visible-by-default messages invisible-by-default
or vice-versa.
* Don't mix visiable-by-default messages with debug messages. e.g. It
seems you made ATA_MSG_INFO debug category and put EH messages and some
debug messages into it. This is not good. EH messages should be
visible to user by default && enabling it shouldn't turn on debug
messages with it.
* Please create ATA_MSG_DEBUG category and put
important-but-not-too-frequent debug messages into it. e.g. The current
patch puts all debug messages during probe into CMD. Turning on CMD
will generate a *lot* of messages and qc issues messages are sometimes
very uninteresting. OTOH, probing messages are generally low-volume but
more interesting. So, it should be possible to slect them separately.
Just put not-too-frequent messages into DEBUG.
* To me, DRV/INFO distinction doesn't seem to be clear.
Thanks for the good work. :)
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-29 16:09 [PATCHSET] libata dbg scheme conversion, take 1 Borislav Petkov
2006-06-29 17:03 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2006-06-29 17:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2006-06-29 17:42 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A407CF.4000508@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=bbpetkov@yahoo.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).