From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Ric Wheeler <ric@emc.com>
Subject: Re: libata EH appears to be NFG up to 2.6.17 (at least).
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 18:09:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AD8A25.7020006@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607061724.13448.liml@rtr.ca>
Mark Lord wrote:
> Enable libata-scsi to report correct sense data on errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
> ---
> --- linux/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c.orig 2006-07-06 17:09:54.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c 2006-07-06 17:17:43.000000000 -0400
> @@ -667,6 +667,13 @@
> qc->ap->ops->tf_read(qc->ap, tf);
>
> /*
> + * Restore the error bit, which got cleared when the
> + * interrupt handler first read the ata_status.
> + */
> + if (qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_DEV)
> + tf->command |= ATA_ERR;
> +
> + /*
> * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits
Again it's an LLDD issue. Your answer of "all LLDDs" sounds a bit
suspicious.
AC_ERR_DEV should not be set unless (a) some code noticed that ATA_ERR
was already present in the Status register, or (b) some code set
AC_ERR_DEV for some reason other than ATA_ERR presence. Both of those
factors depend heavily on LLDD behavior.
ANYWAY, your above patch is not wrong, but it begs the question of where
the problem REALLY lies. Which LLDD sets AC_ERR_DEV when ATA_ERR is not
present?
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-06 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-06 20:37 libata EH appears to be NFG up to 2.6.17 (at least) Mark Lord
2006-07-06 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-06 20:51 ` Mark Lord
2006-07-06 21:24 ` Mark Lord
2006-07-06 22:09 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-07-06 23:22 ` Ric Wheeler
2006-07-07 13:03 ` Mark Lord
2006-07-08 16:56 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44AD8A25.7020006@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ric@emc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).