From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: albertl@mail.com
Cc: Jeff Tranter <tranter@pobox.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Unicorn Chang <uchang@tw.ibm.com>, Doug Maxey <dwm@enoyolf.org>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Ejecting removable disk causes a flood of ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 01:45:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B5DDFB.9090701@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44B5C717.40300@tw.ibm.com>
Albert Lee wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> A problem related to SG_IO.
> When testing the 2.6.18-rc1 libata, a flood of ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL is seen
> after ejecting a removable disk drive:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6799
>
> The interaction to trigger the problem is below:
> 1. The "eject" utility, using SG_IO, issues ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL twice to unlock the disk of the device.
> 2. The disk of the physical device is now unlocked, however, sdev->locked is still 1, inconsistent with the physical device status.
> 3. The "eject" utility ejects the disk by START_STOP_UNIT.
> 4. Someone issues TEST_UNIT_READY. The device is not ready since no disk inside. ATAPI check condition returned.
> 5. 2.6.18-rc1 libata EH triggered in SCSI EH context to request sense.
> 6. scsi_restart_operations(), seeing sdev->locked == 1, tries to lock the door.
> 7. Lock failed since no disk inside. ATAPI check condition returned.
> 8. 2.6.18 libata EH triggered in SCSI EH context. Goto 5 and loop forever until the disk is inserted again.
>
> It looks more like eject/scsi problem. (Libata 2.6.17 EH is not affected by the problem
> because the request sense is done when qc is completed, not in the SCSI EH context.)
>
> Maybe adding a filter to the SCSI SG IO layer to
> - Check incoming SCSI commands
> - Whenever ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL is seen, update the sdev->locked to make the
> kernel data structure consistent with the physical device status
> can fix the problem?
Albert,
Just fix libata. My usb external cd/dvd combo drive has a little switch
under it to unlock the door. How could use of that switch be "filtered"
by an OS?
If an OS wants to maintain a state variable for a device that a
user (and perhaps another initiator) can get to then it needs to
be able to cope with that state variable being out
of sync once in a while.
Doug Gilbert
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-13 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-13 4:07 Ejecting removable disk causes a flood of ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL Albert Lee
2006-07-13 5:45 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B5DDFB.9090701@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=dwm@enoyolf.org \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tranter@pobox.com \
--cc=uchang@tw.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).