From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)! Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:37:50 -0400 Message-ID: <44B7D66E.3070804@rtr.ca> References: <44AEB3CA.8080606@pobox.com> <200607091224.31451.liml@rtr.ca> <1152545639.27368.137.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44B7D0F7.6000302@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:10459 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422677AbWGNRhw (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:37:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik , Sander , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, IDE/ATA development list Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote: > >> So, the drive is rejecting an LBA48 WRITE operation, which should happen >> only if the drive does not have LBA48 support. Now, I know you posted >> all >> of this nice info months ago, but let's see it again now, for the exact >> drive that is generating that specific message. We need to see the >> output >> from "hdparm --Istdout /dev/sdX" for that drive. >> >> Thanks >> > > Here it is: > > They are identical disks (the WD 400KD), both show up as 373GB (formatted): Which *exact* unit generated the WRITE errors you posted about?