From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, lkml@rtr.ca, axboe@suse.de,
forrest.zhao@intel.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libata: implement hotplug by polling
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:57:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44BE9CBC.2000601@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11531196481023-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> This patch implements hotplug by polling - hp-poll. It is used for
>
> * hotplug event detection on controllers which don't provide PHY
> status changed interrupt.
>
> * hotplug event detection on disabled ports after reset failure.
> libata used to leave such ports in frozen state to protect the
> system from malfunctioning controller/device. With hp-poll, hotplug
> events no such ports are watched safely by polling, such that
> removing/replacing the malfunctioning device triggers EH retry on
> the port.
>
> There are three port ops for hp-poll - hp_poll_activate, hp_poll,
> hp_poll_deactivate. Only hp_poll is mandatory for hp-poll to work.
> This patch also implements SATA standard polling callbacks which poll
> SError.N/X bits - sata_std_hp_poll_activate() and sata_std_hp_poll().
>
> By default, hp-poll is enabled only on disabled ports. If a LLD
> doesn't support hotplug interrupts but can poll for hotplug events, it
> should indicate it by setting ATA_FLAG_HP_POLLING which tells libata
> to turn on hp-poll by default.
>
> Putting port into any static powersave mode or setting
> libata.hotplug_polling_interval to zero disables hp-poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
NAK, there is no reason why a global poll list is needed. Simply having
a struct workqueue in each schedule-able entity implicitly creates such
a list. But regardless, this is another example of adding
cross-controller synchronization, where none is needed.
If the worker fired per-host_set, then you could use an ata_port dynamic
flag to indicate the poll-active ports, for the ata_hp_poll_worker() loop.
If the worker fires per-port, then no loop or mutex is needed at all.
You could simply call the hp_poll hook.
> @@ -633,6 +637,10 @@ struct ata_port_operations {
> void (*error_handler) (struct ata_port *ap);
> void (*post_internal_cmd) (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
>
> + void (*hp_poll_activate) (struct ata_port *ap);
> + void (*hp_poll_deactivate) (struct ata_port *ap);
> + int (*hp_poll) (struct ata_port *ap);
> +
> irqreturn_t (*irq_handler)(int, void *, struct pt_regs *);
> void (*irq_clear) (struct ata_port *);
>
All new hooks require at least a one-two sentence description in the
DocBook docs, telling driver writers how to use them.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-19 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-17 7:00 [RFT][PATCHSET] hotplug polling, take 3 Tejun Heo
2006-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] libata: implement hotplug by polling Tejun Heo
2006-07-19 20:57 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-07-24 7:06 ` Tejun Heo
2006-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] libata: add hp-poll support to controllers without hotplug interrupts Tejun Heo
2006-07-19 20:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-17 7:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] libata: add hp-poll support to controllers with hotplug interrutps Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-25 6:25 [PATCH 0/3] hotplug polling, respin Robin H. Johnson
2007-04-25 6:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] libata: implement hotplug by polling Robin H. Johnson
2006-10-15 22:37 [PATCHSET] hotplug polling, take 5 Tejun Heo
2006-10-15 22:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] libata: implement hotplug by polling Tejun Heo
2006-10-10 5:36 [PATCHSET] hotplug polling, take 4 Tejun Heo
2006-10-10 5:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] libata: implement hotplug by polling Tejun Heo
2006-07-05 6:06 [RFT][PATCHSET] hotplug polling, take 2 Tejun Heo
2006-07-05 6:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] libata: implement hotplug by polling Tejun Heo
2006-07-04 14:16 [RFT][PATCHSET] hotplug polling Tejun Heo
2006-07-04 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] libata: implement hotplug by polling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44BE9CBC.2000601@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=forrest.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).