From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: improve initialization and legacy handling, take#2
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 06:13:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D3B889.5090207@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060804210556.GB18792@redhat.com>
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 06:01:32AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, all.
> >
> > This is the second take of improve-init-and-legacy patchset. This
> > patchset contains patches from Jeff Garzik, Alan Cox, Dave Jones and
> > me to fix/clean up initializaton and legacy handling.
>
> It does ? I don't recall writing any of these :)
Oh.. that credit is for the following patch.
====
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/12393/focus=12395
[PATCH 5/5] libata: fix ata_device_add() error path
* dereferences null host_set->ports[] element.
* calls scsi_remove_host() on not-yet-added shost.
This patch fixes both bugs. The first problem was spotted and initial
patch submitted by Dave Jones <davej <at> redhat.com>. The second
problem was mentioned and fixed by Jeff Garzik <jgarzik <at> pobox.com>
in a larger cleanup patch.
====
The patch got moved to another patchset but I forgot to move that part
from head message. Free credit! :)
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-04 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-04 21:01 [PATCHSET] libata: improve initialization and legacy handling, take#2 Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] [libata] some function renaming Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-09 4:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] [libata] Kill 'count' var in ata_device_add() Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] libata: use dummy port for stolen legacy ports Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] libata: rework legacy handling to remove much of the cruft Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] libata: fix several bugs in reworked legacy handling Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] libata: implement dummy port Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] libata: implement per-dev xfermask Tejun Heo
2006-08-05 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-06 14:41 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-06 15:56 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-06 16:08 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] libata: kill unused hard_port_no and legacy_mode Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] libata: replace ap->hard_port_no with ap->port_no Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:05 ` [PATCHSET] libata: improve initialization and legacy handling, take#2 Dave Jones
2006-08-04 21:13 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44D3B889.5090207@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).