From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
Cc: albertl@mail.com, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alan@redhat.com, Unicorn Chang <uchang@tw.ibm.com>,
Doug Maxey <dwm@enoyolf.org>
Subject: Re: libata pata_pdc2027x success on sparc64
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:05:42 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44DA07D6.9010101@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17626.1619.653854.241578@alkaid.it.uu.se>
Hello.
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > The libata version has three improvements compared to the IDE version.
> >
> > 1. The PLL calibration patches in the above URLs (for IDE)
> > still need more improvement as done in the pdc_read_counter()
> > of the libata version.
> >
> > 2. The Promise 2027x adapters check the "set features - xfer mode"
> > and set the timing register automatically. However, the automatically
> > set values are not correct under 133MHz. Libata has a hook
> > pdc2027x_post_set_mode() to set the values back by software.
> >
> > 3. ATAPI DMA is supported (please see pdc2027x_check_atapi_dma()).
> > Maybe we also need to add this to the IDE version.
> Do you know how large the difference is between the 20267 (old driver)
> and the 20269 (new driver) in the areas touched by these patches?
Immense. They belong to the different families, register compatibe only in
the standard PCI/BM IDE regisrer set -- hence was the driver split.
> Long ago I tried a 20267 PCI card in my PowerMac, and it had the same
> issues that the 20269 card had. So I'm interested in porting the
> calibration/timing fixes to pdc202xx_old.c.
They don't apply to this driver at all. The "older" chip family didn't
have the PLL to calibrate. It must be some different issue.
> /Mikael
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-09 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-17 23:58 libata pata_pdc2027x success on sparc64 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-18 18:07 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-07-27 4:31 ` Albert Lee
2006-07-27 16:35 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-08-09 15:59 ` Mikael Pettersson
2006-08-09 16:05 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2006-08-09 16:15 ` Mikael Pettersson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-19 0:29 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-25 16:02 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44DA07D6.9010101@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=dwm@enoyolf.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=uchang@tw.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).