From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: replace pci_module_init() with pci_register_driver() Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:39:31 -0400 Message-ID: <44DB0CE3.8030908@pobox.com> References: <20060810093359.GD6371@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:55514 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161138AbWHJKjf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:39:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060810093359.GD6371@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, proski@gnu.org Tejun Heo wrote: > From: Pavel Roskin > > Replace pci_module_init() with pci_register_driver(). > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > --- > > This patch is against > > upstream (3f066887595de490c411762ce58a31412b09e939) > + improve-init-and-legacy-handling patchset, take #3 > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/12556) > > And avaliable in the following git tree. > > http://htj.dyndns.org/git/?p=libata-tj.git;a=shortlog;h=tj-upstream-pci_register_driver > git://htj.dyndns.org/libata-tj tj-upstream-pci_register_driver FWIW, it is actually better to -not- stack patchsets in this way. git merging enables parallel branches. Since pci-register-driver changes are completely unrelated to the improve-init-and-legacy-handling patchset, it would make sense to have that in an independent branch. Anyway, this is not an acceptance or rejection comment (I plan to merge it). Just a comment. :) Jeff