From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:48:36 -0400 Message-ID: <44DCA6D4.7090304@rtr.ca> References: <1155144599.5729.226.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1155213464.22922.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060810122056.GP11829@suse.de> <20060810190222.GA12818@knob.reflex> <20060810194734.GE11829@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:9447 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932156AbWHKPsm (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:48:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060810194734.GE11829@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Jason Lunz , Alan Cox , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > > I'm not on any of the suspend lists, I was merely comparing the > suspend-others or suspend-libata ration to suspend-ide on linux-kernel, > and the latter is clearly in the minority. I've used ide suspend quite a > bit myself, and never had issues with it (or whichever ones I saw > initially, I fixed). Of course it depends very much on the hardware. I'd > still say that ide suspend probably supports a much wider range of > hardware, than does libata suspend. Of my various notebooks over the years that used drivers/ide, all of them work/worked perfectly with suspend/resume to RAM. Just luck, perhaps. Cheers