From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:01:00 -0400
Message-ID: <44E1D39C.60900@garzik.org>
References: <1155144599.5729.226.camel@localhost.localdomain>	<44DA4288.6020806@rtr.ca> <44DACE9F.3090909@garzik.org>	<44DCA67B.5070400@rtr.ca> <ebsibq$qgb$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:62401 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030297AbWHOOBD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:01:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <ebsibq$qgb$1@sea.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:47:07 -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
>> And libata already has sufficient ioctl compatibility for nearly all
>> purposes with the old drivers/ide stuff.  Yes, there are some more
>> esoteric ioctls that I once implemented in drivers/ide that do not
>> exist for libata, and nobody will miss them.

> IRRC, there nothing for ATAPI ioctl compatibility, there only things for
> ATA.

What _specifically_ is missing, in your opinion?

	Jeff