From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, mlord@pobox.com,
albertcc@tw.ibm.com, uchang@tw.ibm.com, forrest.zhao@intel.com,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement new initialization model w/ iomap support, take 2
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:10:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44EB80BB.5040309@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11559778241753-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Brian, can you please take a look at how LLDs use new init functions
> and see if SAS can use the same approach? If you pass NULL as @sht to
> ata_host_alloc(), it won't associate ports as part of Scsi_Host just
> as ata_sas_port_alloc() does and ata_host_free() will do the right
> thing when freeing a host allocated that way.
I started looking through your patch set and have a few comments.
The idea of a static number of "ata ports" per ata host in SAS doesn't
really work. Since you can have ATA devices under a SAS expander, the
number of possible ATA devices that can be attached to a SAS adapter
can be rather large and can change depending on the SAS fabric. If libata
ever needed to iterate over the ata_port's for a SAS ata_host, then we would
probably need to convert the static array of ata_ports to a linked
list, allowing it to be more dynamic.
Object lifetime rules also have me concerned. Currently, for SAS,
there are a couple objects that libata is concerned with. The first is
an ata_host_set, which I am allocating as part of the scsi_host struct,
so it inherits the object lifetime rules of that. The second is the
ata_port, which I allocate and free in target_alloc/target_destroy,
so I get refcounting for free there as well. Your patch set introduces
an ata_host struct, which is kmalloc'ed and doesn't inherit any of the
above refcounting.
> sata_sil24.c is a pretty straight-forward example. If you can't
> determine the number of ports when allocating host, please take a look
> at how ahci.c initializes its host.
>
> The intention was to allow SAS to use all the regular init/deinit
> functions just as other LLDs. If something doesn't seem to be right,
> please let me know.
I think it can use bits of it, but I think the actual device discovery
process is better initiated by the SAS layer. The SAS layer knows what
devices are out there when it does discovery and can tell libata about
them.
I'm still looking through your patch set, but wanted to get a few comments
out...
Brian
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-22 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-19 8:57 [PATCHSET] libata: implement new initialization model w/ iomap support, take 2 Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 1/20] libata: kill ata_host_stop() Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 14:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 15:29 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 4:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-19 4:50 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/20] libata: implement ata_host_start/stop() Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 6/20] libata: implement legacy ATA init helpers Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 5/20] libata: implement several LLD " Tejun Heo
2006-08-22 22:11 ` Brian King
2006-08-27 9:52 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-30 21:16 ` Brian King
2006-09-19 5:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-19 5:57 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 3/20] libata: implement ata_host_detach() and ata_host_free() Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 4:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 4/20] libata: separate out ata_host_alloc() and ata_host_attach() Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-19 5:48 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 7/20] libata: implement PCI ATA init helpers Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 8/20] libata: reimplement ata_pci_init_one() using new " Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-19 6:04 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 6:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 11/20] libata: use remove_one() for deinit instead of ->host_stop() Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 10/20] libata: reimplement ata_pci_remove_one() using new PCI init helpers Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 13/20] libata: kill unused ->host_stop() operation and related functions Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 12/20] libata: kill old init helpers Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 15/20] libata: move ->irq_handler from port_ops to port_info Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 16/20] libata: make ata_host_alloc() take care of hpriv alloc/free Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 19/20] libata: kill unused ATA_FLAG_MMIO Tejun Heo
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 17/20] libata: make ata_pci_acquire_resources() handle iomap Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-19 6:27 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 6:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 14/20] libata: use LLD name where possible Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 20/20] libata: move scattered PCI ATA functions into liata-pci.c Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 5:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-22 22:10 ` Brian King [this message]
2006-08-27 10:12 ` [PATCHSET] libata: implement new initialization model w/ iomap support, take 2 Tejun Heo
2006-08-30 20:58 ` Brian King
2006-09-01 13:45 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-07 13:22 ` Brian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44EB80BB.5040309@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=forrest.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=uchang@tw.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).