From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [git patch] libata fix Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:08:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4518374D.9060206@garzik.org> References: <20060925193511.GA6129@havoc.gtf.org> <1159216257.11049.137.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:56015 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750840AbWIYUIu (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:08:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1159216257.11049.137.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Llu, 2006-09-25 am 15:35 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jeff Garzik: >> [hey Linus, your git summary hint helped, thanks] >> >> Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of >> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus > > Btw this one doesn't actually solve the FRV case. That's going to need > some more work and thinking. Look for patches tomorrow. It gets FRV to where it was at the point of 2.6.18 release. Whether it worked on FRV at the time of 2.6.18 is quite a different question... This recent push merely exposed _existing_ arch dependencies. They aren't new by any stretch of the imagination. As we see, the push has spurred relevant people into taking the correct action ;-) Jeff