From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:00:33 +0900 Message-ID: <4529F391.3030504@gmail.com> References: <215036450609292206pd16c7cxa1c5c77ee52c050e@mail.gmail.com> <451E7BD2.7020002@gmail.com> <215036450609301849h64551749uf6b4a3e48c57fe15@mail.gmail.com> <4529BCC4.8060906@gmail.com> <215036450610082354q34b906bdp54a3b9cee52a5855@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.180]:2268 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751699AbWJIHAp (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 03:00:45 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n25so2207785pyg for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <215036450610082354q34b906bdp54a3b9cee52a5855@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Jin Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, lkml , Jeff Garzik Joe Jin wrote: >> SRST failure would have still occurred but 30sec timeout should have >> gone. Can you post full dmesg? > > Yes it is. > attachment is the output of dmesg Great. >> Also, please test the patch in the following mail. You can use either >> git or download the full kernel tarball to get the modified kernel. >> > > Did the pathc against 2.6.19-rc1? > I have test it, but it have not any change and timeout also appeared :( It's against libata development tree. So, you downloaded the tar.gz and tested it? Thanks. -- tejun