From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Mark Hatle <fray@gate.crashing.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, hancockr@shaw.ca
Subject: Re: sata_nv failure on 2.4.18 (Fedora Core 6)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:51:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <453EFB51.5080709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161753976.22582.46.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> Does the problem occur on 2.6.18 but not on earlier version? If it
>> doesn't happen on 2.6.17, we can rule out h/w problem.
>
> Difficult to say... this is a fresh install of FC6 and it's a production
> box (heh, it handles my email !) so we can't easily test plenty
> different kernels on it unfortunately... If 2.6.17 can be booted and
> works fine on FC6, might be worth giving it a go but I wouldnt' expect
> too many tests of that sort.
>
>> * If 2.6.17 shows the same problem : could be a faulty drive or
>> problem in the controller. NV SATA controllers supply two
>> interfaces - legacy TF/BMDMA and ADMA. The former tends to react
>> badly when error condition occurs. Driver for ADMA interface is
>> under development. It could be that the controller cannot cope with
>> transient transmission errors. If this is the case, ADMA driver
>> should be able to fix it.
>
> Do we have any contact at nVidia that could rule on that issue ? The
> drives both appear to work fine on the SIL controller...
Robert Hancock is working on nv adma suppport.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13608
W/ the above patch, sata_nv should be able to recover much better from
error conditions, but we still have to find out why such errors are
occurring in the first place.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-25 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-25 4:01 sata_nv failure on 2.4.18 (Fedora Core 6) Mark Hatle
2006-10-25 4:28 ` Tejun Heo
2006-10-25 4:35 ` Mark Hatle
2006-10-25 5:03 ` Mark Hatle
2006-10-25 5:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-25 5:46 ` Tejun Heo
2006-10-25 5:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-25 5:51 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-09 22:29 Jonathan Cohen
2006-11-21 6:58 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=453EFB51.5080709@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=fray@gate.crashing.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).