From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: AHCI support on Intel chipsets (confusion?) Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:34:51 +0900 Message-ID: <4572D27B.3000909@gmail.com> References: <45715381.80206@SystemDesignWorks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.224]:853 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756890AbWLCNfD (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:35:03 -0500 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so1728560nze for ; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 05:35:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45715381.80206@SystemDesignWorks.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Wayne Sherman Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Wayne Sherman wrote: > So, does the kernel source code incorrectly indicate some of these > chipsets are AHCI compatible? Not really. If the controller has PCI ID of 0x27c1, it's an ahci controller. Care to post full dmesg and the result of 'lspci -nn'? -- tejun