linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* sata_sil24 performance weirdness
@ 2006-12-27 13:45 Robin H. Johnson
  2006-12-28  3:55 ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2006-12-27 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ide, Tejun Heo

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2464 bytes --]

I forward-ported Tejun's PMP patches to libata#upstream (my first attempt at it
a few weeks ago failed, but this round works fine, tested at each branch
stage), and in using them, I have noticed a bit of oddity.

While dmesg claims that 3.0Gbps was negotiated, the combined performance of the
5 disks never exceeds 1.5Gbps, no matter how I combine them. Is something in
the driver overriding the 3Gbps speed bits somewhere?

My SATA enclosure the 5-disk Fusion 500P from Sonnet (PMP 0x1095:0x3726)

Controller:
Mass storage controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)

Drives:
5x Seagate ST3320620AS (7200.10 320Gbyte)

ata9: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000070000 ctl 0x0 bmdma 0x0 irq 18
ata10: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000072000 ctl 0x0 bmdma 0x0 irq 18
scsi10 : sata_sil24
ata9: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata9.15: Port Multiplier 1.1, 0x1095:0x3726 r23, 5 ports, feat 0x9/0x9
ata9.00: hard resetting port
ata9.00: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata9.01: hard resetting port
ata9.01: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata9.02: hard resetting port
ata9.02: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata9.03: hard resetting port
ata9.03: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata9.04: hard resetting port
ata9.04: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata9.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 625142448 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
ata9.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata9.01: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 625142448 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
ata9.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata9.02: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 625142448 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
ata9.02: configured for UDMA/133
ata9.03: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 625142448 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
ata9.03: configured for UDMA/133
ata9.04: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 625142448 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
ata9.04: configured for UDMA/133
ata9: EH complete
scsi11 : sata_sil24
ata10: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
scsi 10:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      ST3320620AS      3.AA PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
SCSI device sdi: 625142448 512-byte hdwr sectors (320073 MB)
sdi: Write Protect is off
sdi: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
(rest of the disks sdi-> sdm all brought up in an identical fashion here).

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* sata_sil24 performance weirdness
@ 2006-12-27 18:25 Richard Scobie
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Scobie @ 2006-12-27 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ide

Robin H. Johnson wrote:

 >While dmesg claims that 3.0Gbps was negotiated, the combined 
 >performance of the 5 disks never exceeds 1.5Gbps, no matter how I 
 >combine them. Is something in the driver overriding the 3Gbps speed 
 >bits somewhere?

Perhaps there is a hardware/firmware issue with the Sil3132, as this has 
been reported at a reputable Mac hardware performance site, see:

http://www.barefeats.com/quick.html

The December 23rd entry, "ExpressCard SATA bandwidth woes" mentions 
exactly this issue with an Express card using the Sil3132 and on a 
Sil3132 based SATA Adaptor card.

Regards,

Richard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-28 11:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-27 13:45 sata_sil24 performance weirdness Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-28  3:55 ` Tejun Heo
2006-12-28 11:34   ` Robin H. Johnson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-27 18:25 Richard Scobie

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).