From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: ahaas@airmail.net, fragabr@gmail.com, j.taimr@chello.nl,
ben@atomnet.co.uk, acb@h2h.de,
tkrah@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de, sero4linux@freenet.de,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATA ATAPI detection debug
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:30:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B5AB6B.5070903@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AB36B0.2050702@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> Many people have been reporting libata PATA ATAPI detection problem. In
> many but not all cases, the ATAPI device was occupying the slave slot
> while a disk drive occupies the master slot. Based on that and J.
> Taimr's nullify freeze on via fix, I made a cocktail patch which
> contained four different fixes and it seemed to have fixed the problem
> for (at least) several people, but the reports are not all consistent.
>
> The attached patches contain the same four fixes but has a selector
> parameter to enable each fix separately. Both are equivalent but using
> 2.6.20-rc5 is recommended to rule out detection problems fixed by
> polling IDENTIFY.
>
> If your libata driver is compiled into the kernel, add
> 'libata.debug_cocktail=N' to your kernel parameter. If you compile
> libata.ko as module, add 'debug_cocktail=N' module parameter to the
> module parameter. e.g. 'modprobe libata.ko debug_cocktail=1'.
Daniel Fraga and Sero's cases are different issue while I can't
determine whether J. Taimr's case is limted on via chipset. So, I need
more input to proceed.
*Please* test and report the results.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-23 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-15 8:09 PATA ATAPI detection debug Tejun Heo
2007-01-23 6:30 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-01-23 13:55 ` Art Haas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B5AB6B.5070903@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=acb@h2h.de \
--cc=ahaas@airmail.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ben@atomnet.co.uk \
--cc=fragabr@gmail.com \
--cc=j.taimr@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sero4linux@freenet.de \
--cc=tkrah@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).