From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, j.taimr@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_via: don't diddle with ATA_NIEN in ->freeze
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:24:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B92E07.2040904@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070125114659.GD8606@htj.dyndns.org>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> vt6420 completely loses its ability to raise IRQ for ATAPI devices if
> ATA_NIEN is diddled with in ->freeze. Further investigation is
> necessary to determine whether this problem is shared on other
> controllers but it doesn't seem to be at this point.
>
> Make vt6420's ->freeze only clear IRQ to fix this problem. This makes
> vt6420 relatively more prone to IRQ storms but the controller is way
> too braindamaged to worry about that anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
> Jeff, this fix is verified to fix J. Taimr's case and a few other
> reported that 2.6.20-rc5 fixed their ATAPI detection problems too. We
> still have several case to hunt down but getting verified fixes in
> early helps separating different causes. Please include this in
> #upstream-fixes. Thanks.
applied to #upstream-fixes
> @@ -204,6 +205,15 @@ static void svia_scr_write (struct ata_p
> outl(val, ap->ioaddr.scr_addr + (4 * sc_reg));
> }
>
> +static void svia_noop_freeze(struct ata_port *ap)
> +{
> + /* Some VIA controllers choke if ATA_NIEN is manipulated in
> + * certain way. Leave it alone and just clear pending IRQ.
> + */
> + ata_chk_status(ap);
> + ap->ops->irq_clear(ap);
> +}
> +
please send an update patch to conform to the following minor libata
policy nit: when calling a hook inside a driver, you should call the
hook function directly, rather than bothering with an indirect reference.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-25 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-25 11:46 [PATCH] sata_via: don't diddle with ATA_NIEN in ->freeze Tejun Heo
2007-01-25 12:32 ` Alan
2007-01-25 22:24 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-01-26 5:57 ` [PATCH] sata_via: style clean up, no indirect method call in LLD Tejun Heo
2007-01-26 22:24 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B92E07.2040904@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=j.taimr@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).