linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: reduce ATA command timeout to 7secs
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:12:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45C362ED.3040600@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070202063748.GC1625@htj.dyndns.org>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Both ATA and ATAPI devices used the default timeouts defined by SCSI
> high level driver.  For both disks and ODDs, it was 30secs, which was
> way too long for disks.  This patch makes most ATA commands time out
> after 7secs - the de facto ATA command timeout, while leaving ATAPI
> timeout at 30secs.

Good patch, LONG overdue.

But 7 seconds is too short.  I have drives here now that
take slightly more than 7 seconds to report media errors.

With this patch, libata will timeout/reset the drive just before
it had a chance to tell us why it was taking too long.

The result would be that we might lose data unnecessarily,
especially in combination with the current SCSI policy of
blindly failing the entire request when only one sector was bad.

I've used 10 second timeouts with 100% success over the past 14 years,
which allows just enough margin (+2) for drives to finish their internal
retries and report back.

NACK to 7, ACK to 10 seconds.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-02 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-02  6:37 [PATCH] libata: reduce ATA command timeout to 7secs Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 10:08 ` Alan
2007-02-02 11:49   ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 13:25 ` Ric Wheeler
2007-02-02 15:12   ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 15:39     ` Alan
2007-02-02 16:13       ` Mark Lord
2007-02-02 16:43         ` Eric D. Mudama
2007-02-02 18:47           ` Alan
2007-02-02 23:00             ` Eric D. Mudama
2007-02-03 23:34             ` Ric Wheeler
2007-02-03  4:31       ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-03 19:59         ` Alan
2007-02-03 19:50           ` Mark Lord
2007-02-02 16:12 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2007-02-03  4:45   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45C362ED.3040600@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).